Written by Peter Rodriguez

The Book of Daniel – Chapter 5

Available in other languages: Português

Belshazzar: This was the son of Nabonidus, who in turn was the son of Nebuchadnezzar.

For over two thousand years, Belshazzar’s existence was unknown outside the Book of Daniel. There was no archaeological evidence or references in extrabiblical sources—until the mid-19th century, when an ancient Babylonian clay cylinder was discovered. On this cylinder, the father of Belshazzar mentioned his son by name: “As for me, Nabonidus, king of Babylon, save me from sinning against your great godhead and grant me as a present a life long of days, and as for Belshazzar, the eldest son—my offspring—instill reverence for your great godhead in his heart and may he not commit any cultic mistake, may he be sated with a life of plenitude.” (Nabonidus Cylinder from Ur, published by the Dutch historian Jona Lendering on Livius; emphasis added)

Daniel knew of Belshazzar’s existence, something unknown to later writers, simply because he lived during the sixth century BC and wrote his book during that period.

Belshazzar the king: Belshazzar ruled as king alongside his father, Nabonidus.

“Dr. Theophilus G. Pinches has recently published some extracts from two tablets from Erech which are in the possession of an Englishman, Mr. Harding Smith, which throw some additional light on these points. It was customary for Babylonians in confirming a contract to swear by the name of the reigning king, and one of these tablets contains a contract, dated in the 12th year of Nabuna’id [Nabonidus], in which a man bound himself by the oath of Nabuna’id [Nabonidus], King of Babylon, and of Belshazzar, the king’s son.” (George A. Barton, Archæology and the Bible; emphasis added)

The fact that he swore an oath in the name of both Nabonidus and Belshazzar shows that they were both reigning kings.

The Verse Account of Nabonidus is another recent archaeological finding that makes a reference to Belshazzar, this time showing him as a reigning king (just as Daniel shows in his book): “[…] when the third year was about to begin — he entrusted the army to his oldest son, his first born, the troops in the country he ordered under his command. He let everything go, entrusted the kingship to him [to his firstborn son, who was Belshazzar according to the Nabonidus Cylinder that we saw], and, himself, he started out for a long journey. The military forces of Akkad marching with him, he turned to Tayma deep in the west.” (Verse Account of Nabonidus, published by the Dutch historian Jona Lendering on Livius; emphasis added)

No writer or historian after the sixth century knew of Belshazzar the son of Nabonidus, and they all assumed that Nabonidus was the last king of Babylon.

It is only through these firsthand historical sources from the 6th century B.C. (the Book of Daniel and the recently discovered Babylonian records) that we can know about Belshazzar’s existence and that he was king of Babylon.

Nebuchadnezzar his father: However, the historical records we saw shows that Belshazzar was son of Nabonidus.

And the prophecy said that the nations would serve the Babylonian empire until the son of Nebuchadnezzar’s son. But here, the last king of the Babylonian empire is called the son of Nebuchadnezzar.

Remember what was discussed in the introduction to this series: not every term in Scripture should be translated literally, as doing so can result in meanings far removed from what the biblical author intended. This is one such example. Daniel wrote in Semitic languages, about 2,500 years ago, in the cultural context of the Middle East of that time. Naturally, the way Daniel and his contemporaries expressed ideas is not entirely the same as ours.

We limit the word “son” to mean a literal son, but the book of Daniel was not written in 21st century English.

“The Semitic use of the word in question [son] goes far beyond the first degree of descent, and extends the appellation of ‘son’ to the designation ‘grandson,’ and even of the most remote posterity. In Ezra 6:14, the prophet Zechariah is called ‘the son of Iddo;’ in Zechariah 1:1, Zechariah 1:7, the same person is called ‘the son of Berechiah, the son of Iddo.’ So Isaiah threatens Hezekiah (Isaiah 39:7) that the sons whom he shall beget shall be conducted as exiles to Babylon; in which case, however, four generations intervened before this happened. So in Matthew 1:1, ‘Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.'” (Albert Barnes, Barnes’ Notes on the Bible)

And completed it: Brought it to a conclusion. The time and period appointed by God for the Babylonians to reign over the nations was completed. They will not reign the nations anymore.

Would you like to support our work?

Your support will help us produce more content and reach more people

PayPal ⦁ Pix ⦁ Monero

Do you have a question about this chapter?

Check if it has already been answered in the Q&A section below. If not, please send it to our email address:

questions@thebloodstainedbanner.org